I think the biggest obstacle in purchasing RDRAM is knowing that licensing money is going to Rambus. If you get nauseated at the thought of that, I can respect that reaction. It seems to me that Rambus is plagued with bad morals and ethics when it comes down to how the company has been run. What we're focusing on here though is the technology they can deliver, not how Rambus might have tried to screw everyone that will ever buy a stick of memory.
Finally, what's going to be the biggest factor for many of us is cost. While the SLK-800 is still not yet in the retail channel here in the States, Thermalright did let us know that their target MSRP was US$44.95. This puts the SLK-800 right between the prices I got from their competitors' websites. The Swifty sells for around US$53 while the PAL 8045 can be found for under US$40. All of these prices are sans fan! We all tend to know that MSRP prices usually end up being a bit high compared to what's paid online, and I would not hesitate to guess that we might see the SLK-800 come in at or below the current PAL 8045 price. No, these heatsinks are not inexpensive, but the SLK-800 seems to be far from costing a lot considering what you're getting for your dollar. Damn, for a piece of copper .
It will be nice when we lay our hands on ATI IGP 320 boards since an Nvidia "high executive" said that he will "eat an ATI board" if it outperform its Nforce 220.
As it stands right now, the GeForce4 440 Go holds the crown as the most powerful mobile gaming solution out there today. The GeForce4 440 Go in maximum performance mode has the ability to play 3D games as well as or better than a large number of desktop systems out there, making the transition to a notebook all the more easy. In fact, the discrete GeForce4 440 Go performs very similarly to the desktop GeForce4 MX 440; an impressive feat.
ET: How do you expect Parhelia to stack up versus the competition, particularly versus Nvidia's GeForce 4 Ti 4600? Are there areas where you believe you have specific advantages and disadvantages? Please elaborate.
DW: We believe that Parhelia is in a class all of its own. In the Parhelia, Matrox has integrated a large number of new technologies, which have immediate benefits to our end users with real applications. The focus is on image quality, the widest support for multi-display desktops, unique new anti-aliasing algorithms, increased quality at excellent performance levels. There should be a fun benchmark for PC enthusiasts. Playing games with Surround Gaming enabled is just a lot more fun. It is really something that you have to experience for yourself to fully appreciate. For the professional users, we believe that we're the only company that is bringing innovative, useful new technology to the plate (GigaColor, Glyph anti-aliasing, TripleHead, Dual DVI at 1600x1200, highest fidelity outputs, 10-bit RAMDACs).
Dell has not previously shown much interest in the market for handhelds, in part because those devices are usually sold through retail channels, where the company doesn't have a presence. The ARS report speculates that Dell might have reversed itself to try to push further into the enterprise market, where handhelds are quickly becoming as ubiquitous as notebooks for traveling office workers.
Visiontek has managed to create yet another excellent product. The Xtasy GeForce4 Ti 4200 has managed to prove itself very well in terms of performance, overclockability and quality. Even at default clock speeds, the Ti 4200 measured very well against the higher end models offering amazing performance at a lower price while maintaining all the advanced features in the GeForce4 Ti line such as full DirectX 8 support and the pixel and vertex shaders. The Ti 4200 cards are also very good overclockers in general and we had no problems hitting 300/550 for the Visiontek Xtasy GeForce Ti 4200. At this clockspeed, the Xtasy GeForce4 Ti 4200 beats the Ti 4400 and comes almost neck to neck with the flagship Ti 4600 cards which is really amazing for the price.
A bit disappointed with performance overall compared with the other i845E solution from ASUS, the P4B533-E, as well as the other boards that were compared. Although the Soltek SL-85DR2 is nowhere near as integrated as some i845E platforms, it does serve the lower end of the market quite comfortably around the $220 AUD or $120 USD mark, nearly halving the retail price of the ASUS P4B533-E. The design of the board is great, and the silver PCB is pretty unique in its own way. It was a shame that Soltek didn't incorporate 'unofficial' DDR333 asynchronous operation or AGP/PCI bus speed selection into their BIOS, but perhaps it will be made possible with their next BIOS update.
Even with all of the impressive features the SS40G already comes with, there are a few I would like to see eventually added. An available AGP port would definitely make the SS40G a more complete "All In One" system. I know with the limited space I'm probably asking for the impossible, but it would definitely be a HUGE plus for the SS40G. I have seen cube PCs that have a AGP slot. It isn't impossible.
After individually reviewing so many KT333 boards, it has become clear that performance plays a very small part. This is because the frame rates between the fastest and slowest KT333 boards are insignificant. Those seeking the very best performing KT333 boards, even if it means getting every last frame, would be seeking something along the lines of an Abit KX7-333R or ASUS A7V333. Those who appreciate onboard features and of course value, will be looking for something more like the Shuttle AK35GTR v2.2 or GigaByte 7VRXP. Although I am unaware of the price range in which the KX400+ sits, I can still comment on the boards overall value. The Albatron KX400+ is clearly no speed demon and really does not offer the features of say, a SOYO KT333 Dragon Ultra! or Abit AT7 MAX motherboard. The only feature that drew me in to review the KX400+ is the memory overclocking feature, giving the user the ability to run memory at DDR400 speeds. Though after testing the board I am not 100% convinced this is the case as I explained in my BIOS overclocking section.
Initial results from the ATI A3 based FIC AT31 Fusion are mixed. While 2D and 3D quality and DVD playback are excellent, 3D performance definitely lags behind the 420 chipset. Overall performance is greater than in the 3D realm comparatively, but it is certain that at this stage memory bandwidth needs to be increased. I'm sure a BIOS update and some fresh drivers will help.
The Kazaa Lite website is back[PAGEBREAK]
The website for the famous spyware-free version of Kazaa, Kazaa Lite's official website has just come back online after over a week of being down. See for yourself (link to Kazaa Lite site).
Battery life has been a key issue in previous generations of devices using Pocket PC 2002, according to Kevin Burden, an analyst with research firm IDC. The new iPaqs will use Intel's 400MHz XScale PXA250 processors, which should improve power management.
As is the case with most Asus boards, the P4T533-C was no disappointment. Quite the contrary -- the P4T533-C demonstrated excellent performance, and solid support for PC1066 memory and the benefits it brings. All our tests ran without any problems, with the P4T533-C never flinching or breaking a sweat. In our opinion, the P4T533-C is well-equipped to sit at the center of a high-performance PC -- preferably in the company of a 533MHz FSB 2.53GHz Pentium 4, and loads of PC1066 memory. And why not? After all, the 4.2GB/sec transfer rate of the 533MHz FSB P4 is well matched with the 4.2GB/sec of bandwidth of PC1066 memory. In short, we're proud to award the Asus P4T533-C motherboard our highest distinction, and warmest recommendations.
Gigabeat will cost about $405 (50,000 yen) in Japan, including a 5GB hard drive. Drives will also be available separately in 2GB and 5GB models, costing $162 and $324. Toshiba said the device would eventually be sold in the United States and Europe, but representatives were unaware of a European launch schedule.
The ECS K7VTA3 revision 3.1 packs a lot of punch for a budget KT333 board. For around $70 you get RAID, LAN, and USB 2.0 along with excellent performance. For someone looking for a powerful system on a budget it would make an excellent choice. Overclockers will be left wanting more than ECS has provided, but those one a budget will definitely take notice.
According to sources, the upcoming RV250 is an updated version of the Radeon 8500 chip. However, given that it integrates the TV-out decoding function, the chip is smaller in size, thus reducing the production costs of both chip and graphics card manufacturers. Other features like the four-pipeline architecture and AGP 4x support remain unchanged. The difference between AGP 2x and 4x isn't that much because the CPU needs to do less work than before (with all the added features of the GPUs). Therefor, less bandwith is needed, but more is always better .
The Geforce 4 Ti4200 is a fantastic chip and if you have the money to spend on the more expensive variants you should still give it consideration. X-Micro's Impact T4200 is what many people have been looking for in a GeForce4-based board. Great stock performance, video in/out capabilities, 128MB of memory, and a decent price tag to match. Truly, these Ti4200 cards are what the GeForce4 MX should have been. And I fully agree.
As we've mentioned before, there's not much to get you excited when talking about the Athlon MP 2100+; it's a 66MHz clock speed increase that we've had on the desktop side for three months now. The performance boost that you get in dual processor environments over the "old" 2000+ is around 4% in some of the best case scenarios, which were illustrated by our database server tests. It's not the Athlon MP 2100+ that we should be focusing on however, it is AMD's strategy going into 2003 that requires our attention. (By the way, the Xeon 2.4Ghz won in all tests except the forum database test)
It is easily said that the performance of this card sits exactly where it should be. Taking up position in between that of it’s big brother the Ti 4400 and the previous generation champ, the GF3 Ti 500, this card will provide all but the most fanatical of hardcore gamers exactly what they need to play their way through whatever games they desire. And, not only will it run games at excellent frame rates, it will do so with it’s battery of image quality enhancing features enabled. As I have previously stated, once you play for a while with AA and AF enabled you simply will not be able to go back to the blurred textures and jaggy polygon edges of old.
I'm up so early today due to the fact of a bad fire alarm. The unit has malfunctioned due to steam from the shower (that my Mom was taking). It has done this in the past as well. Needless to say we ripped the thing out of the ceiling. I can't get back to sleep so I'll post some news...
What really astounded me about this board was not just the performance, it was not the extensive features, but it was more the value this KT333 solution offered. For just $130 US this board can be purchased online, which is a pretty damn good price compared to other KT333 boards. You may have seen this coming, but we at Legion Hardware have decided to give the ASUS A7V333 our Performance Award. It has clearly been earned and we think that ASUS have really found their hole with this one!
In other words, it's difficult to find anything wrong with the IT7 Max -- especially since it flew through all our tests. As a result, we can do nothing less than give the Abit IT7 Max our highest honors, and our heated recommendations.
Otellini said Intel is not planning chips that can handle both 32-bit and 64-bit code. Bilingual chips, such as rival AMD's forthcoming Opteron, could be cheaper and easier for corporations to adopt, analysts have said, because much existing software will work on them.
I was able to finally see that demo running on an Athlon 2100+ with 256Mb of system Ram even though its recommended to have at least 512Mb and of course we used Nvidia George 4 TI 4600. Since we like to try different things we tried the same demo on a Gainward George 4 TI 4200 power pack and we were amazed.
And now we are left with the same very basic problem that I was going to attempt to unravel at the start of this article. With the three processors Ive seen and tested based on the new Thoroughbred core, I have overclocked one by 117 MHz, one by 200 MHz and another by over 300 MHz. What is our statistical norm then? What would consumers see when purchasing their own Thoroughbred processor? In order to know with degree of credibility, we would have to do a lot more testing on hundreds, if not thousands, of processors. That is obviously not something we can just sit down and do here at Amdmb.com. It will take months, probably, for enough product (based on the Thoroughbred core) to get out into the hands of the users so we can begin to see results from that many processors. It looks like we will have to wait until then to get a good consensus on the power of the initial release of the Thoroughbred processor.