ASE Labs
Welcome Guest. Please register or log in now. There are 123 people online (0 Friends).
  • Home
  • Articles
  • News
  • Forum
  • Register/Login

News

January 24, 2011

Government Internet Takeover Bill Returns

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on January 24, 2011 at 11:15:12 AM
It seems that the bill that would allow the President to selectively disable internet services to parties is coming back in the new Congress. Let's see if the new Republican majority in the house would allow a vote on it considering their rule that a bill must be grounded in the Constitution. The fact that this bill is even proposed is terrible. You can't give a single person (the President) the power to block communications. There is no judicial review! And what's to stop the government from declaring dissenting political views are illegal and block every single site they don't agree with. What are we now? China?

Quote

The revised version includes new language saying that the federal government's designation of vital Internet or other computer systems "shall not be subject to judicial review." Another addition expanded the definition of critical infrastructure to include "provider of information technology," and a third authorized the submission of "classified" reports on security vulnerabilities. ...

Lieberman, who recently announced he would not seek re-election in 2012, said last year that enactment of his bill needed to be a top congressional priority. "For all of its 'user-friendly' allure, the Internet can also be a dangerous place with electronic pipelines that run directly into everything from our personal bank accounts to key infrastructure to government and industrial secrets," he said.

Civil libertarians and some industry representatives have repeatedly raised concerns about the various proposals to give the executive branch such broad emergency power. On the other hand, as Lieberman and Collins have highlighted before, some companies, including Microsoft, Verizon, and EMC Corporation, have said positive things about the initial version of the bill.

But last month's rewrite that bans courts from reviewing executive branch decrees has given companies new reason to worry. "Judicial review is our main concern," said Steve DelBianco, director of the NetChoice coalition, which includes eBay, Oracle, Verisign, and Yahoo as members. "A designation of critical information infrastructure brings with it huge obligations for upgrades and compliance."

In some cases, DelBianco said, a company may have a "good-faith disagreement" with the government's ruling and would want to seek court review. "The country we're seeking to protect is a country that respects the right of any individual to have their day in court," he said. "Yet this bill would deny that day in court to the owner of infrastructure."


http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20029282-281.html
Tags Rights Internet Government
[Print] [Top]
2 Comments
March 9, 2010

Corrupt Politicians Want National ID Card

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on March 9, 2010 at 10:19:34 AM
As if it wasn't bad enough already, Schumer (the schmuck from NY-D) and Graham (the moron from SC-R) want to add in a national ID card to an immigration bill. This is how it starts, people! We have never, ever, been a nation of "let me see your papers" and this just flies in the face of that.

Schumer and Graham are both progressives, regardless of the party you see them in. Instead of fixing the problem (like not having wide open borders so illegal aliens come in), they try to put a bandage on it by throwing more government at the problem.

Do you honestly think that this ID card will stop at workers? There aren't many times I agree with the ACLU, but this is one of them. It is completely un-American and I hope the voters in NY and SC get rid of these two losers.

Quote

A person familiar with the legislative planning said the biometric data would likely be either fingerprints or a scan of the veins in the top of the hand. It would be required of all workers, including teenagers, but would be phased in, with current workers needing to obtain the card only when they next changed jobs, the person said.

The card requirement also would be phased in among employers, beginning with industries that typically rely on illegal-immigrant labor.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce doesn't have a position on the proposal, but it is concerned that employers would find it expensive and complicated to properly check the biometrics.

Mr. Schumer said employers would be able to buy a scanner to check the IDs for as much as $800. Small employers, he said, could take their applicants to a government office to like the Department of Motor Vehicles and have their hands scanned there.


See. Now the government is in control of all the jobs in the private economy. That doesn't sound like a free market to me. Don't get me wrong, I don't want American jobs going to illegal aliens, period. Fix the problem, not the symptom.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703954904575110124037066854.html
Tags Rights Government Legal Politics
[Print] [Top]
1 Comment
March 7, 2010

Why DRM Doesn't Work: Assassin's Creed 2

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on March 7, 2010 at 10:33:09 PM
A simple reason why DRM doesn't work; you screw your own customers. Let's take a look at Ubisoft's new game, Assassin's Creed 2. The game REQUIRES you to be logged into to their activation server the entire time. This means activation AND play time are tied to their own servers. If they go down, the product you paid for is now useless.

And that just happened. Their servers are down and the people that paid for the game can't play it. A huge thread on Ubisoft's forum is erupting. http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/4721051016/m/7481010838/p/1

Response: http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/4721051016/m/7481010838?r=6531081838#6531081838

Quote

I don't have any clear information on what the issue is since I'm not in the office, but clearly the extended downtime and lengthy login issues are unacceptable, particularly as I've been told these servers are constantly monitored.

I'll do what I can to get more information on what the issue is here first thing tomorrow and push for a resolution and assurance this won't happen in the future. I realise that's not ideal but there's only so much I can do on a weekend as I'm not directly involved with the server side of this system.


Since you already bought the game, we don't care about fixing the issue ASAP. We can wait till tomorrow. How many gamers purchased this game and found this? Don't support companies that put this type of lunacy on their products! DRM is just wrong and takes away consumer rights.
Tags DRM Games Rights Ubisoft
[Print] [Top]
2 Comments
February 28, 2010

WARNING: Federal Government To Oversee Internet

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on February 28, 2010 at 10:17:47 AM
I don't hide the fact that I'm a libertarian and one of the tenets of that is to uphold personal freedoms and have a limited federal government. The Federal Government wants to intrude on one of the most basic rights that we are given when we are created, the ability to speak freely and openly; I mean, on the internet. The government wants power to oversee areas of the internet and wants to be able to control certain aspects.

Let's look at their comments.

Quote

In the physical world, I associate the dynamics of a natural ecosystem with two important concepts: first, the presence of some set of biological laws such as natural selection, that second, leads to a balance or equilibrium state so that even when there is a disturbance these natural operations and laws bring the ecosystem back to a equilibrium state (maybe different than before, but an equilibrium).

Applying this concept to the online ecosystem could lead us to accept the idea that the Internet is self-regulating and there is some natural order that will always emerge no matter how the system may be disturbed. From this concept some argue that policymakers should just leave the Internet alone.

In fact, "leaving the Internet alone" has been the nation’s Internet policy since the Internet was first commercialized in the mid-1990s. The primary government imperative then was just to get out of the way to encourage its growth. And the policy set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 was: "to preserve the vibrant and competitive free market that presently exists for the Internet and other interactive computer services, unfettered by Federal or State regulation."

This was the right policy for the United States in the early stages of the Internet, and the right message to send to the rest of the world. But that was then and this is now.


That was then and this is now? What changed? You don't think that the internet has become a medium to allow political views to be disseminated to large audiences of like minded people would be the cause? No... Couldn't be. My question to you, why is it when something works does the Federal Government want to regulate it?

What's the purpose of the Federal Government regulating the internet? This is what the document says are problems.

Quote

  • If users do not trust that their credit card numbers and private information are safe on the Internet, they won’t use it.
  • If content providers do not trust that their content will be protected, they will threaten to stop putting it online.
  • If large enterprises don’t have confidence that their network will not be breached over the Internet, they will disconnect their network and limit access to business partners and customers.
  • If foreign governments do not trust the Internet governance systems, they will threaten to balkanize the Domain Name System which will jeopardize the worldwide reach of the Internet.


People won't buy stuff on the internet? Please, what are the Feds looking at? The next three are FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) trying to evoke a emotional knee-jerk reaction. All the points are unfounded and even if they were, government needs to stay out and let the internet manage itself as it has done for a long time.

What are the goals of this new policy?

Quote

  • Privacy policy. Here’s the question: How can we enable the development of innovative new services and applications that will make intensive use of personal information but at same time protect users against harm and unwanted intrusion into their privacy? We are launching a series of listening sessions this spring with industry, advocates and academics in the field, and will follow up with a notice of inquiry and public outreach events.
  • Child protection and Freedom of Expression: As more children go online, how do we ensure proper targeting of law enforcement resources against serious crime while remembering that most important line of defense against harmful content is the well- informed and engaged parent or teacher? Later this year, the Online Safety Technology Working Group, created by Congress and convened by NTIA, will issue a report on the state of the art in child protection strategies online.
  • Cybersecurity: How do we meet the security challenge posed by the global Internet which will require increased law enforcement and private sector technology innovation yet respect citizen privacy and protect civil liberties. We’re participating in a Commerce Department cybersecurity initiative that will address these issues, particularly as they relate to improving the preparedness of industry for cyber attacks.
  • Copyright protection: How do we protect against illegal piracy of copyrighted works and intellectual property on the Internet while preserving the rights of users to access lawful content? NTIA and our sister agency at the Department of Commerce, the US Patent and Trademark Office, are beginning a comprehensive consultation process that will help the Administration develop a forward-looking set of policies to address online copyright infringement in a balanced, Internet-savvy manner.
  • Internet Governance: In our role administering the Federal government’s relationship with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), how do we ensure that ICANN serves the public interest and conducts its activities with the openness and transparency that the global Internet community demands? Last fall, NTIA and ICANN set forth a framework for technical coordination of the naming and numbering system and I am looking forward to soon participating in the first of the administrative reviews to ensure that these commitments are carried out in full.


Slippery slope? No, it is a avalanche and we're in the face of it. If you let the Federal Government do this, it will be the end of the internet as you and I know it. What happens when the Feds find something they don't approve of on the internet? You think that child porn is the only thing? No political views would ever be suppressed? Hmm...

Read it for yourself: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/presentations/2010/MediaInstitute_02242010.html
Tags Rights Internet Government
[Print] [Top]
0 Comments
October 2, 2008

Backing Up Data In The 'Cloud'? Not For Music

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on October 2, 2008 at 2:22:11 PM
EMI has tried and failed to file suit against the CEO of MP3tunes.com. It is a service that only allows you to have a digital file store to retrieve files from anymore. There is no sharing, no swapping. Only the person's account has access. This makes it easy to have access to your library from anyway. The music cartels are floored about this 'unfair' fair use! They want you to have to buy a copy for each location you want to play it. See how fair that is?

Quote

The bad news for Robertson is the judge allowed EMI, one of the four largest recording companies, to continue to pursue the copyright claims against MP3tunes, court documents show. The case, filed last November in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, was brought by 14 record companies and music publishers affiliated with EMI. MP3tunes enables users to store music in the so-called cloud. The company's 150,000 customers upload their music into "lockers." They can then access the tunes from nearly any Web-enabled device. EMI argues that MP3tunes doesn't have authorization to exploit the company's music this way. A representative from EMI couldn't be reached for comment late Wednesday evening.


To exploit music this way? Look assholes, I buy something and it is mine. I can do whatever I want to do to it.
Tags Rights Legal RIAA
[Print] [Top]
0 Comments
September 4, 2008

Google Says "Whoops" to EULA Controversy.

Poster: Logan King
Posted on September 4, 2008 at 1:30:10 AM
So, Google Chrome came out yesterday, and most people blindly flocked to it en masse. However, many began noticing a disturbing message written in the EULA that made it sound like anything you do with the browser is the property of Google.

Today, Google said that was a mistake.

Quote

Google's new web browser Chrome is fast, shiny, and requires users to sign their very lives over to Google before they can use it. Today's Internet outrage du jour has been Chrome's EULA, which appears to give Google a nonexclusive right to display and distribute every bit of content transmitted through the browser. Now, Google tells Ars that it's a mistake, the EULA will be corrected, and the correction will be retroactive.

As noted by an attorney at Tap the Hive and various and sundry other sites, the Chrome EULA reads like a lot of Google's other EULAs. It requires users to "give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and nonexclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services."

Linky.

I dunno if I like the idea of a Google web browser, especially with the Feds constantly trying to get Google to turn over private information. I'm glad that they clarified what everything meant in the EULA, but it also seems to me like they still have that information regardless. I think I'll stick to using Google only as a search engine.
Tags News Technology Google Rights Chrome
[Print] [Top]
2 Comments
July 18, 2008

USA ISPs Go Insane And Sign Censorship Agreement

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on July 18, 2008 at 7:11:08 PM
Welcome to America, land where the big corporation control what you see. That is the gist of what is happening now that a load of major ISPs have signed a Message of Understanding with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (a private company). The MOU gives NCMEC the supreme authority to judge whatever website it wants to be taken down AND have the person's name and address forwarded to them for prosecution. We live in very troubling times when this sort of thing happens.

And don't bring the argument that we need to "think of the children." When a private corporation can censor what a country sees, what's to stop them for censoring a political party or other things that many people want to see (porn)?

This kind of corporate behavior is completely un-American and the NCMEC and the ISPs that signed this 'agreement' should be charged with sedition. Ohh, did you know that the NCMEC doesn't want their name to be included when a site is taken down?

Did you also know that there is no oversight. If the NCMEC says to take down a site, that's it.

Quote

"Building on our strong commitment to online safety, the cable industry wants to help combat child pornography and exploitation," said Kyle McSlarrow, President & CEO, NCTA. “By signing the NCMEC MOU, cable Internet service providers are reaffirming their strong commitment to online safety and Internet literacy for all American families." "We are deeply grateful for this industry-wide attack on child pornography," said Ernie Allen, President & CEO, NCMEC. "It is not possible to arrest and prosecute every offender. We must be creative and build new public-private partnerships to address this insidious problem more effectively. Today's announcement represents a bold step forward."


This is a bold step forward for the corporate control of America. It started in 1919 with the Tax act. How long can we as Americans allow this trampling of our rights to continue?
Tags Rights Censorship Privacy
[Print] [Top]
0 Comments
May 25, 2008

Guilty Verdict In Criminal Copyright Case

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on May 25, 2008 at 1:48:46 PM
You've read right... A guilty verdict has been rendered on the first online music copyright case with criminal charges. I agree that copyright infringement is wrong, I don't agree that it should be a criminal matter nor do I believe the damages being sought fit what was done. This isn't stealing.

Quote

According to the RIAA, evidence presented in the case showed that he received payment from the leader of the group in return for this work. "For the first time ever, a criminal online music piracy case went to trial, and the jury rendered a swift and unanimous verdict," said Brad Buckles, executive vice president of the RIAA's anti-piracy division. "The crimes committed here -- as well as the harm to the music community -- are severe, and so are the consequences.


This case is different in that this guy received payment for copyright infringement and found media that were trade secrets (pre-released). It still shows that the media cartels control the law and normal people like you and me are really screwed when it comes to rights.
Tags Rights Legal RIAA
[Print] [Top]
1 Comment
May 20, 2008

NBC Used The Flag

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on May 20, 2008 at 2:40:52 PM
It turns out that NBC did use the DRM broadcast flag to block recording of its shows. Another reason to switch to fully open systems that give you full rights. Microsoft's own Media Center blocks recordings so you get what you paid for... a cheap hacked system that sides with the media cartels instead of consumers. This is why MythTV works so well. It is free and unencumbered by meaningless DRM. What's worse, this may have been a test by NBC to see if people would care that they couldn't record shows. Bad press and resentment from the community said they did. It is a good thing that people are aware of the issue and that people know that Media Center from Microsoft trashes consumer rights.

Quote

The NBC spokeswoman said the network had no intention of blocking the show but declined to specify how the error was made. Flags that have been issued accidentally aren't uncommon, some industry insiders say. While acknowledging that it "fully adheres to flags used by broadcasters," Microsoft said that it was working with content owners to reduce the number of false flags. "The success of the entire distribution chain is dependent on all involved maintaining the necessary checks and quality control so that coding is correctly applied," a Microsoft spokeswoman wrote in an e-mail to News.com. Meanwhile, the larger issue for some is that Microsoft and possibly other hardware and software makers will honor broadcast flags. "Customers need to know who Microsoft is listening to and how that affects their equipment," said Danny O'Brien, a staffer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an advocacy group for Internet users.


I love how Microsoft tries to spin everything that they do wrong. Face it Microsoft, you are doing a disservice to consumers. There is no other way around it.
Tags DRM Rights Software Microsoft NBC
[Print] [Top]
0 Comments
May 19, 2008

Microsoft: We Don't Care About Consumers

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on May 19, 2008 at 2:19:26 PM
Microsoft is admitting that they support the broadcast flag that content owners want to shove down consumer throats. Windows Media Center PCs refused to record two shows because of this flag. That's what you get when you can't inspect the source code. You gets lies and deceit. People should turn to free and open alternatives such as MythTV which rocks.

Quote

The software company was responding to questions about why some users of Windows Vista Media Center were prevented from recording NBC Universal TV shows, American Gladiator and Medium on Monday night. The "rules," in which the spokeswoman is apparently referring to are those proposed by the FCC, which would require software and hardware makers to honor "broadcast flags." The flags are code that broadcasters can insert into the data stream of TV shows that typically require restrictions on the recording of the shows. What she didn't say is that the "rules" aren't rules at all. The courts struck down the FCC's proposal in 2005, saying the regulator lacked the authority to tell electronics makers how to interpret the signals they receive. Since then, Microsoft and other manufacturers have retained the option of whether to honor the flags.


Leave it to Microsoft to spread more BS about the FCC "rules" that were overturned by courts three years ago.
Tags Rights Software Microsoft
[Print] [Top]
0 Comments
August 6, 2007

Warrantless Wiretapping Outside USA Approved

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on August 6, 2007 at 2:32:22 PM
Yay for the destruction of privacy in America. Don't think about making international calls. Your calls can be tapped without warrant.

Quote

The 227-183 vote, which followed the Senate's approval Friday, sends the bill to Bush for his signature. Late Saturday, Bush said, "The Director of National Intelligence, Mike McConnell, has assured me that this bill gives him what he needs to continue to protect the country, and therefore I will sign this legislation as soon as it gets to my desk." The administration said the measure is needed to speed the National Security Agency's ability to intercept phone calls, e-mails and other communications involving foreign nationals "reasonably believed to be outside the United States." Civil liberties groups and many Democrats said it goes too far, possibly enabling the government to wiretap U.S. residents communicating with overseas parties without adequate oversight from courts or Congress.


Bills like this are straight bullshit and SHOULDN'T be allowed in this country.
Tags Rights Government Legal
[Print] [Top]
1 Comment
July 24, 2007

Ask Offers Private Searching By Year's End

Poster: Rich
Posted on July 24, 2007 at 2:14:14 PM
Ask.com wants to cease retaining search information for its users. It is intended to create some feature that can be easily turned on and off. They are also going to review contracts with third party partners (like Google) to limit what they are allowed to do with the information that they obtain from Ask. Hopefully, this will be a step in the right direction for internet privacy. It's nice to see that someone cares. Though I'm sure their agenda isn't all that altruistic. They just want market share like everyone else. Maybe I should say that it's nice to see that someone is listening.....
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19873128/

Quote

"Ask.com became the first major search engine to promise users it won't store data on their queries, giving the privacy conscious the option of conducting research on the Internet in relative anonymity. The move comes amid increasing concerns about the release of search information through leaks or subpoenas. In some cases, the search terms a person uses can reveal plenty about medical conditions, marital troubles or kinky interests."
Tags Rights
[Print] [Top]
1 Comment
July 19, 2007

EU Protects ISP Member Info

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on July 19, 2007 at 12:15:24 PM
In regards to civil cases (which is what all this 'piracy' nonsense is about), the EU states that ISPs are not required to relinquish records of their members to outside entities. Looks like the RIAA is having a tough time this week... Arrrr.

Quote

Copyright groups may not be able to demand that telecom companies hand over the names and addresses of people suspected of swapping music illegally online, a senior legal adviser to the EU's highest court said. Advocate General Juliane Kokott, advising the European Court of Justice, said Wednesday that EU law directs governments to resist the disclosure of personal data on Internet traffic in civil cases - unlike criminal cases, where compliance would be required.
Tags Rights Legal
[Print] [Top]
0 Comments
April 26, 2007

MPAA: Committed To Fair Use?

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on April 26, 2007 at 6:47:00 PM
With DRM of course. Though they completely sidestep the issue that the DMCA disallows breaking DRM encryption. This is the case even for fair use which is totally legal for everyone. Those bastards.

Quote

The MPAA does recognize that progress on DRM needs to be made soon, or impatient consumers will increasingly turn to unauthorized sources for content. "We're working on this right now, trying to find ways to make it interoperable," he said, but added that pricing and business models for such a system are "way beyond my pay grade." Dean Garfield, VP of Legal Affairs for the MPAA, told me that he has confidence in the market to sort all of these issues out. "You have to give some thought to how young the digital distribution market is," he said. "I suspect that the issues confounding people today won't be the issues challenging the industry six months from now."


That progress on DRM should include getting rid of it all together.
Tags DRM Rights MPAA
[Print] [Top]
0 Comments
December 26, 2006

UK Cameras Fitted With Speakers

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on December 26, 2006 at 2:40:18 PM
This seems like a particular movie that I like to speak about, doesn't it? I reported about this before, but it is so bad that I need to bring it up again. Attaching speakers to cameras will allow the government to actively police every single person in a bad way. This is not how society should function. There needs to be personal interaction. Talk about invasion of privacy.

Quote

During the past decade, the government has spent 500 million pounds ($1 billion) on spy cameras and now has one for every 14 citizens, according to a September report prepared for Information Commissioner Richard Thomas by the Surveillance Studies Network, a panel of U.K. academics. Who's In Charge? At a single road junction in the London borough of Hammersmith, there are 29 cameras run by police, government, private companies and transport agencies. Police officers are even trying out video cameras mounted on their heads. "We've got to stand back and see where technology is taking us,'' said Thomas, whose job is to protect people's privacy. "Humans must dictate our future, not machines.''
Tags Rights Government Privacy
[Print] [Top]
2 Comments
November 28, 2006

Illinois Bans Free Speech

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on November 28, 2006 at 2:35:47 PM
And the courts declare it unconstitutional. IL tried to ban video games with boobies.

Quote

In August 2005, the Illinois State Legislature enacted the Sexually Explicit Video Game Law ("SEVGL"), which criminalized the sale of "sexually explicit" video games to minors, and required purveyors of such games to conspicuously label any sexually explicit game with a four square inch label reading "18", and provide relevant signage within the stores where games are sold. The Entertainment Software Association, among others, filed suit against the State of Illinois the day after the SEVGL was enacted, claiming that the law violated the First Amendment. The district court permanently enjoined enforcement of the law, and the State of Illinois sought review. On appeal, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the lower court's holding that the statue was not narrowly tailored.
Tags Rights Legal Courts
[Print] [Top]
11 Comments
November 16, 2006

Vista DRM: Nobody Likes It

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on November 16, 2006 at 2:49:45 PM
Call it whatever you want, nobody likes DRM. Vista will be tightly locked down to the point where you don't have control of what you purchased. I think that this will be Microsoft's fall... at least one final driving nail.

Quote

Vista's DRM technologies fall into several distinct categories, all of which are either completely new to the operating system or represent a significant change from the technology found in previous versions of Windows. The Intel-developed Trusted Platform Module (TPM) makes DRM harder to circumvent by extending it beyond the operating system and into the PC's hardware components. TPM is used with Vista's BitLocker full-drive encryption technology to protect a PC's data against security breaches. A TPM microchip embedded on the PC's motherboard stores unique system identifiers along with the BitLocker decryption keys. If a system is tampered with -- for example, if the hard drive is removed and placed in a different machine -- TPM detects the tampering and prevents the drive from being unencrypted.
Tags DRM Rights Vista
[Print] [Top]
17 Comments
October 23, 2006

Stallman Too Pigheaded For GPL?

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on October 23, 2006 at 1:35:16 PM
I seem to read all these articles saying how Stallman will fragment the open source community. There are two conflicting ideas. Free software and open source. It is a large debate.

Quote

But while Torvalds has been enshrined as the Linux movement's creator, a lesser-known programmer--infamously more obstinate and far more eccentric than Torvalds--wields a startling amount of control as this revolution's resident enforcer. Richard M. Stallman is a 53-year-old anticorporate crusader who has argued for 20 years that most software should be free of charge. He and a band of anarchist acolytes long have waged war on the commercial software industry, dubbing tech giants "evil" and "enemies of freedom" because they rake in sales and enforce patents and copyrights--when he argues they should be giving it all away.
Tags Rights GPL Stallman
[Print] [Top]
4 Comments
October 22, 2006

End Of Youtube

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on October 22, 2006 at 6:14:32 PM
The primary reason that most people go to YouTube is now coming to an end. Google will start handing user data over for copyright violations. Now watch YouTube's traffic hit the bottom and move somewhere else.

Quote

YouTube's actions in response to a subpoena it received in May show that it has been keeping tabs on users who post copyrighted material to its site -- and in one case shared the name of a user with lawyers from a Hollywood film studio. On May 24, lawyers for Viacom Inc.'s Paramount Pictures convinced a federal judge in San Francisco to issue a subpoena requiring YouTube to turn over details about a user who uploaded dialog from the movie studio's "Twin Towers," according to a copy of the document.
Tags Google Rights YouTube
[Print] [Top]
0 Comments
September 29, 2006

Fourth Amendment No More

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on September 29, 2006 at 3:01:18 PM
The House just approved the warrantless wireless tapping bill. This is a terrible day for America. Hopefully the Senate will be smarter and NOT allow this kind of crap to happen. If it does become a law, a judge should have no problem in overturning it due to the precendent set in the Bill Of Rights. These assholes in government need to know that people will not stand for their freedoms being violated in this manner.

Quote

The Senate also could vote on a similar bill before Congress recesses at the end of the week. Leaders concede that differences between the versions are so significant they cannot reconcile them into a final bill that can be delivered to Bush before the Nov. 7 congressional elections. For its part, the White House announced it strongly supported passage of the House version but wasn't satisfied with it, adding that the administration "looks forward to working with Congress to strengthen the bill as it moves through the legislative process."
Tags Rights US Congress
[Print] [Top]
4 Comments
September 26, 2006

Telecoms Feeling The Pretexting Heat

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on September 26, 2006 at 1:44:57 PM
I think privacy violations like these should be held accountable by the company that wanted the information and the company that failed to protect the consumer details. HP and these telecoms should be brought up and made an example of.

Quote

Some telecom providers appear to have bolstered their security earlier this year after pretexting became the subject of congressional hearings and private lawsuits unrelated to HP's current woes. AT&T said last week that in a memo to its call centers it put in place additional verification requirements, though the company would not detail those measures. Cingular said it no longer permitted its representatives to divulge records of phone calls over the phone to customers. The HP investigators who placed pretext calls used remarkable ingenuity in extracting information from the telecommunications companies--this technique of getting people to divulge confidential information is broadly known as "social engineering."
Tags Rights Privacy
[Print] [Top]
1 Comment
September 25, 2006

British Library Wants Sane Copyright Laws

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on September 25, 2006 at 4:07:16 PM
The British Library has called for restrictions on the use of DRM which precludes people from using material that would normally be accessable under copyright law. It is making the tide turn to favor contract law over copyrights. We cannot give businesses this type of power.

Quote

"DRM is a technical device, but it's being used in an all-embracing sense. It can't be circumvented for disabled access or preservation, and the technology doesn't expire (as traditional copyright does). In effect, it's overriding exceptions to copyright law," Brindley said. The British Library hopes to protect statutory exceptions and fair dealing, which enable libraries to make and preserve copies of content, and make them available for research purposes and for disabled people.
Tags DRM Rights
[Print] [Top]
1 Comment
September 22, 2006

EU Tries Software Patents Again

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on September 22, 2006 at 1:47:51 PM
It is so strange that the EU 'gets' software patents... They just don't work! That won't stop stupid government bodies paid by cartels to keep trying for them, though. It amazes me that the US doesn't see this. Why do we have these litigation prone software patents?

Quote

The EPLA is "anchronistic", and is even disliked by some large companies such as Nokia and GlaxoSmithKline, according to Austrian Green MEP Eva Lichtenberger. Others said the measure would effectively take the software patent issue out of the reach of the EU's democratic controls. "We are all for improvements to the European patent system, but we must continue the search for solutions within the framework of the EU," said Maria Berger, the PES' spokeswoman for legal affairs, and former French prime minister Michel Rocard, in a statement.
Tags Rights Patent
[Print] [Top]
0 Comments
September 20, 2006

Gonzales Wants Massive Data Retention

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on September 20, 2006 at 1:31:11 PM
I want to warn anyone that this type of talk is very dangerous. Hiding under the guise of reducing child porn (which I agree is a noble cause), Gonzales wants to force ISPs to retain customer data for a very long time. The problem arises when the data is now being held and is ready for the taking. "Well, since the data is being retained, we can check for suspected terrorist activities since we have warrantless wiretappings... Ohh? This person is talking against the government, he must be doing something wrong. We should get all of his ISP communications as well." Where do we draw the line? Privacy is important! Do not let the government talk our privacy rights away! Stop this legislation now.

Quote

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Tuesday that Congress should require Internet service providers to preserve customer records, asserting that prosecutors need them to fight child pornography. Testifying to a Senate panel, Gonzales acknowledged the concerns of some company executives who say legislation might be overly intrusive and encroach on customers' privacy rights. But he said the growing threat of child pornography over the Internet was too great.
Tags Rights
[Print] [Top]
3 Comments
September 18, 2006

Worst... DRM... Ever...

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on September 18, 2006 at 1:45:24 PM
Some stupid company in Taiwan wants to embed RFID tags in optical disks. This is the worst piece of technology ever. Region locks are crap and finding out where media is being played and being reported to the companies? I'm sorry, once I buy something, your rights to that physical media are now gone. I own it.

Quote

The technology, which can also be used for Blu-Ray and HD-DVD discs, will allow movie studios to remotely track individual discs as they travel from factories to retail shelves to consumers' homes. Home DVD players will eventually be able to check on the chip embedded in a disc, and refuse to play discs which are copied or played in the 'wrong' geographical region, the companies behind the technology expect. "This technology holds the potential to protect the intellectual property of music companies, film studios, gaming and software developers worldwide," said Gordon Yeh, chief executive of Ritek Corporation.
Tags DRM Rights
[Print] [Top]
2 Comments
September 14, 2006

The USA Turns ILLEGAL

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on September 14, 2006 at 1:52:03 PM
Troubling times are ahead for all American citizens. I am ashamed to even say that I'm an American after I read this piece of shit legislation going through. This illegal warrantless wiretapping bill MUST be voted down. OUR CIVIL LIBERTIES ARE AT STAKE. Call your senators now and tell them to VOTE THIS BILL DOWN.

Quote

* Redefines surveillance so that only programs that catch the substance of a communication need oversight. Any government surveillance that captures, analyzes and stores patterns of communications such as phone records, or e-mail and website addresses, is no longer considered surveillance.
* Expands the section of law that allows the attorney general to authorize spying on foreign embassies, so long as there's no "substantial likelihood" that an American's communication would be captured.
* Repeals the provision of federal law that allows the government unfettered wiretapping and physical searches without warrants or notification for 15 days after a declaration of war. The lack of any congressional restraint on the president's wartime powers arguably puts the president at the height, rather than the ebb, of his powers in any time of war, even an undeclared one.
* Repeals the provision of federal law that limits the government's wartime powers to conduct warrantless wiretapping and physical searches to a period of 15 days after a declaration of war.
* Repeals the provision of federal law that puts a time limit on the government's wartime powers to conduct warrantless wiretapping and physical searches against Americans. Under current law, the president has that power for only 15 days following a declaration of war.
* Allows the attorney general, or anyone he or she designates, to authorize widespread domestic spying, such as monitoring all instant-messaging systems in the country, so long as the government promises to delete anything not terrorism-related.
* Moves all court challenges to the NSA surveillance program to a secretive court in Washington, D.C., comprised of judges appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Only government lawyers would be allowed in the courtroom.
* Allows the government to get warrants for surveillance programs as a whole, instead of having to describe to a judge the particular persons to be monitored and the methods to be used.
Tags Rights Legal Privacy
[Print] [Top]
14 Comments
August 11, 2006

Amicus Briefing Filed In RIAA Vs. Innocents

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on August 11, 2006 at 3:20:05 PM
The RIAA is now in deep due to count them... the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the American Civil Liberties Union, Public Citizen, the ACLU of Oklahoma Foundation, and the American Association of Law Libraries. They have submitted an amicus curiae brief in support of the motion for attorneys fees that has been made by Deborah Foster in Capitol Records v. Debbie Foster, in federal court in Oklahoma. The Brief (PDF).

Quote

This is an important case. While it may appear to many as just one woman defending herself against several large corporate copyright plaintiffs, as the court is undoubtedly aware, this lawsuit is but one battle in the broader war the RIAA is waging against unauthorized internet copying. As a result of this war, the RIAA has wrought havoc on the lives of many innocent Americans who, like Deborah Foster, have been wrongfully prosecuted for illegal acts they did not commit for over a year despite their clear innocence and persistent denials. Using questionable methods and suspect evidence, the RIAA has targeted thousands of ordinary people around the country, including grandmothers, grandfathers, single mothers, and teenagers. In its broad dragnet of litigation, the RIAA has knowingly entangled the innocent along with the guilty, dragging them through an expensive and emotionally draining process of trying to clear their names. In deciding whether or not to grant defendant Deborah Foster's Motion For Attorneys Fees, the court should consider the broader context of the RIAA lawsuit campaign - especially the positive effect that a fee award would have on encouraging the RIAA to be more diligent in conducting its pre-suit investigations, more prompt in dismissing suits when a defendant asserts substantial claims of innocence or mistaken identity, and more responsible in asserting its legal theories. Moreover, a fee award would encourage innocent accused infringers to stand up and fight back against bogus RIAA claims, deter the RIAA from continuing to prosecute meritless suits that harass defendants it knows or reasonably should know are innocent, and further the purposes of the Copyright Act by reaffirming the appropriate limits of a copyright owner's exclusive rights.
Tags Rights Law RIAA Court
[Print] [Top]
1 Comment
August 4, 2006

France Supports DRM

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on August 4, 2006 at 2:50:18 PM
The old anti-DRM bill that made France look good is now a law without teeth. Back to their wussy ways I see. I'll change my opinion if the law changes.

Quote

France's main opposition party, the Parti Socialiste, has promised that, should it be elected in 2007, it will revise the law, after consulting with artists, consumers, businesses and Internet service providers. "The law is unworkable, and its problems are growing," said Anne Hidalgo, the party's national secretary for culture and the media.
Tags DRM Rights Law France
[Print] [Top]
1 Comment
August 1, 2006

DRM Vs. Fair Use At Siggraph

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on August 1, 2006 at 12:35:12 PM
It is Sony vs. the world at Siggraph. On the left is fair use and on the right is DRM and harm to consumers. I'll give you a hint, fair use lost.

Quote

The discussion went on for almost two hours and didn't often stray from concerns about fair and personal use, privacy and rights protection for digital content. The criticism of Sony and its industry was fierce, considering the audience consisted of computer graphics industry professionals, who themselves benefit from the protections of copyright laws. There was one source of consumer irritation, however, that Singer did not even try to defend. "Why, when I buy a DVD, am I forced to watch commercials?" an audience member asked. "I know. I agree. I'm with you there," Singer said, laughing.
Tags DRM Rights Fair Use
[Print] [Top]
0 Comments
July 26, 2006

More Net Legislation

Poster: Aron Schatz
Posted on July 26, 2006 at 1:50:21 PM
Congress has once again screwed with internet website owners. It is now a federal criminal offense to put improper meta tags on certain sites. Where does it stop? STOP LEGISLATING SOMETHING YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND. Morons.

Quote

"America's children will be better protected from every parent's worst nightmare--sexual predators--thanks to passage" of the legislation, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said in a statement on Tuesday. House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, in a statement issued after the House approved the bill by voice vote, said: "We've all seen the disturbing headlines about sex offenders and crimes against children. These crimes cannot persist. Protecting our children from Internet predators and child exploitation enterprises are just as high a priority as securing our border from terrorists."


Reading statements like this make me want to punch someone in the face... really hard. I hate when people say "Think of the Children!!!". MAKE PARENTS DO THEIR OWN JOBS. My parents imposed NO restrictions on what I could do and yes, I think I was better off than some puritanical idiot that was sheltered by government mandates. This is the same crap that is happening in schools. Let the kids be kids and get hurt. Dodgeball is FUN. If your kid gets hurt, DEAL WITH IT. He is weak! No, instead the parents sue the school and everyone loses.
Tags Stupid Rights Government
[Print] [Top]
2 Comments
Page: ««First [1] 2 Last»»
Login
Welcome Guest. Please register or log in now.
Forgot your password?
Navigation
  • Home
  • Articles
  • News
  • Register/Login
  • Shopping
  • ASE Forums
  • Anime Threads
  • HardwareLogic
  • ASE Adnet
Latest News
  • Kingston HyperX Cloud 2 Pro Gaming Headset Unboxing
  • Synology DS415+ Unboxing
  • D-Link DCS-5020L Wireless IP Pan/Tilt IP Camera
  • Actiontec WiFi Powerline Network Extender Kit Unboxing
  • Durovis Dive Unboxing
  • Bass Egg Verb Unboxing
  • Welcome to the new server
  • Gmail Gets Optional Preview Pane
  • HBO Go on Consoles
  • HP Touchpad Update
Latest Articles
  • D-Link Exo AC2600 Smart Mesh Wi-Fi Router DIR-2660-US
  • HyperX Double Shot PBT Keys
  • Avantree ANC032 Wireless Active Noise Cancelling Headphones
  • ScharkSpark Beginner Drones
  • HyperX Alloy FPS RGB Mechanical Gaming Keyboard
  • D-Link DCS-8300LH Full HD 2-Way Audio Camera
  • Contour Unimouse Wireless Ergonomic Mouse
  • HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro Gaming Headset
  • Linksys Wemo Smart Home Suite
  • Fully Jarvis Adjustable Standing Desk
Latest Topics
  • Hello
  • Welcome to the new server at ASE Labs
  • Evercool Royal NP-901 Notebook Cooler at ASE Labs
  • HyperX Double Shot PBT Keys at ASE Labs
  • Avantree ANC032 Wireless Active Noise Cancelling Headphones at ASE Labs
  • ScharkSpark Beginner Drones at ASE Labs
  • HyperX Alloy FPS RGB Mechanical Gaming Keyboard at ASE Labs
  • D-Link DCS-8300LH Full HD 2-Way Audio Camera at ASE Labs
  • Kingston SDX10V/128GB SDXC Memory at ASE Labs
  • What are you listening to now?
  • Antec Six Hundred v2 Gaming Case at HardwareLogic
  • Sans Digital TR5UTP 5-Bay RAID Tower at HardwareLogic
  • Crucial Ballistix Smart Tracer 6GB PC3-12800 BL3KIT25664ST1608OB at HardwareLogic
  • Cooler Master Storm Enforcer Mid-Tower Gaming Case at HardwareLogic
  • Arctic M571-L Gaming Laser Mouse at ASE Labs
  • Contour Unimouse Wireless Ergonomic Mouse at ASE Labs
Advertisement
Advertisement
Press Release
  • Huntkey Has Launched Its New Power Strips with USB Chargers on Amazon US
  • Inspur Releases TensorFlow-Supported FPGA Compute Acceleration Engine TF2
  • Hot Pepper Introduces Spicy New Smartphones in US Markets
  • Sharp Introduces New Desktop Printers For The Advanced Office
  • DJI Introduces Mavic 2 Pro And Mavic 2 Zoom: A New Era For Camera Drones
  • DJI Introduces Mavic 2 Pro And Mavic 2 Zoom: A New Era For Camera Drones
  • Fujifilm launches "instax SQUARE SQ6 Taylor Swift Edition", designed by instax global partner Taylor Swift
  • Huawei nova 3 With Best-in-class AI Capabilities Goes on Sale Today
  • Rand McNally Introduces Its Most Advanced Dashboard Camera
  • =?UTF-8?Q?My_Size_to_Showcase_Its_MySizeId=E2=84=A2_Mobil?= =?UTF-8?Q?e_Measurement_Technology_at_CurvyCon_NYC?=
Home - ASE Publishing - About Us
© 2010 Aron Schatz (ASE Publishing) [Queries: 15 (8 Cached)] [Rows: 458 Fetched: 201] [Page Generation time: 0.03217601776123]